Nondestructive
Testing of Ceramic Materials
by
Ali Abdul-Aziz*
As far back as the mid 1970s, we were reading
articles in Scientific American regarding the ability
of computers to reconstruct images taken with X-rays in the
medical profession. The technology has now become relatively
commonplace and here we see encouraging examples of it in NDT.
Discontinuity sizing by this advanced technique is obviously
very necessary for the applications outlined in this review
article.
Roderic K. Stanley
Associate Technical Editor
|
Ceramic matrix composites are being
considered as candidate materials for high temperature aircraft engine
components to replace the current high density metal alloys. Ceramic
matrix composites are engineered materials composed of coated 2D high
strength fiber tows and a ceramic matrix. Matrix voids are common
discontinuities generated during the infiltration process. The effects
of these matrix voids are usually associated with a reduction in the
initial overall composite stiffness and a decrease in the thermal
conductivity of the component. Furthermore, the role of the matrix as
well as the coating is to protect the fibers from the harsh engine
environment. Hence, the current design approach is to limit the design
stress level of ceramic matrix composite components to be below the
cracking stress (Abdul-Aziz et al., 2003).
In
order to promote the expanded application of engineering
ceramics, the use of appropriate NDT techniques is critical.
In order to promote the expanded application of engineering
ceramics, the use of appropriate nondestructive testing (NDT)
techniques is critical. NDT is highly essential for process control,
assurance of high quality products and reliable performance in service
(Abdul-Aziz et al., 2003; Bray and McBride, 1992; Cartz, 1995; Kim and
Liaw, 1998; Kim et al., 2003; Martin et al., 2003; Mix, 1987;
Richerson, 1992; Schwartz, 1997). This paper presents a brief tutorial
and summary of some available NDT techniques that are currently used
in testing monolithic ceramics and ceramic matrix composites. The
advantages and limitations of each technique are listed, as well as
their applications. These procedures include ultrasonic testing,
radiography, X-ray computed tomography and infrared thermography. In
addition, other NDT techniques and approaches that are being used and
developed are discussed in the technical papers featured in this
issue.
X-ray Computed Tomography
The computed tomography technique was initially implemented in the
medical field in the early 1970s, but has since gained recognition as
an important tool in the material research area as a viable NDT
technique. It is used to measure volumetric information, such as
dimensions, voids, inclusions and density variations, within a solid
and to provide pictorial views of the internal and external structure
of materials (Abdul Aziz et al., 2003). The most important advantage
of computed tomography is the possibility of an accurate 3D
visualization and quantification of the internal structure of
materials using a series of 2D cross-sectional computed tomography
images.
A computed tomography system typically contains an X-ray radiation
source and a radiation detector as well as a precision manipulator to
scan cross-sectional slices from different angles. Typically, the X-ray
source is collimated to form a thin fan beam. The fraction of the attenuated
X-ray beam received is directly related to the density and thickness
of the test object, the composition of the material and the energy of
the X-ray beam. To obtain a full set of imaging data, the test subject,
X-ray source or detector array rotates and a sequence of measurements
is made from multiple incremental angles. The data acquisition system
reads the signal from each detector in the array, converts the measurements
into numeric values and transfers the data to a computer for digital
reconstruction. The reconstruction process uses an algorithm to identify
the point by point distribution of the X-ray densities in the 2D image
of the cross sectional slice. Figure 1 illustrates the computed tomography
scanning process.

Figure 1 - The relationship of an X-ray
tube, detector, image reconstruction computer and display monitor
in the computed tomography process.
Ultrasonic Testing
Ultrasonic testing is among the most common techniques used for
quality control and service integrity testing due to its low cost and
convenience of data collection. It is used to detect, locate and size
material discontinuities. The ultrasonic region is generally defined
as sonic waves of 20 kHz or higher frequency. In ultrasonic testing,
beams of high frequency sound waves are introduced into materials so
as to detect both surface and internal discontinuities. The sound
waves travel through the material and are deflected at the interfaces
or by discontinuities. The deflected beam is displayed in an
oscilloscope viewport and analyzed to determine the presence of
discontinuities. Most ultrasonic tests are performed at frequencies
between 0.1 and 25 MHz. There are several ultrasonic testing
techniques used in testing ceramic materials, including:
- an A-scan, which presents 1D discontinuity information (in the
oscilloscope view, the A-scan signal displays the pulse and
amplitude against time; the A-scan display is commonly used to
measure material thickness and for point by point discontinuity
detection)
- a B-scan, which displays a parallel set of A-scans with 2D data
(the B-scan can also be used to test rotating tubes and pipes
because it provides a cross-sectional view of discontinuity
distribution)
- the C-scan, which is the most widely used scan mode (it provides
a 2D presentation of discontinuity distribution and displays the
size and position of discontinuities in an area parallel to the
surface through the raster scan of two axes; turbine blade roots
and attachments are common components typically tested via this
technique).
Figures 2 and 3 show a representative sketch of an ultrasonic testing
and a typical immersion ultrasonic setup. Figure 4 shows 1 MHz through-transmission
ultrasonic test results of a reinforced carbon/carbon specimen from
a test panel associated with the Return to Flight program at NASA Glenn
Research Center. The figure demonstrates the difference between the
preimpact and postimpact condition of the panel, where the black indicates
the damaged or delaminated region that was not visually or optically
detected (Martin et al., 2003).

Figure 2 - A schematic
of the through-transmission ultrasonic testing setup (Kim
et al., 2003).
Figure 3 - Typical immersion
ultrasonic setup.
Figure 4 - A 1 MHz through-transmission
test of a reinforced carbon/carbon specimen: (a) baseline peak
amplitude image prior to impact; (b) peak amplitude image following
foam impact.
Infrared Thermography
Infrared thermography is a powerful NDT method for the
characterization of composite materials. Since composite materials
possess relatively high emissivities depending upon the type of
material, surface finish and so on, this makes them well suited for
tests, with or without surface treatments (Kim et al., 2003; Martin et
al., 2003). Generally, this technique involves the heating of a
specimen with a short duration pulse of energy and monitoring the
transient thermal response of the surface of the specimen with an
infrared camera. The thermal energy on the surface travels into the
cooler interior of the sample. In turn, there is a reduction of the
surface temperature over time. This surface cooling will occur in a
uniform manner as long as the material properties and surface
condition are consistent throughout the specimen. Subsurface
discontinuities that possess different thermal properties (for
example, thermal conductivity, density or heat capacity) will affect
the flow of heat in that particular region. This resistance in the
conductive path causes a different cooling rate at the surface
directly above the discontinuity, when compared to the surrounding
material free of discontinuities. The change in the subsurface
conduction is seen as a nonuniform surface temperature profile as a
function of time. Analysis of thermographic data involves the
examination of images based on the temperature/time data or
derivatives calculated from the original data sets. Areas with
discontinuities can then be identified based on deviations from the
ideal cooling behavior.
Thermography can also be used to measure thermal diffusivity. A flash
lamp provided a short heat pulse (2400 W in this investigation) to the
front surface, and the infrared camera was used to record the temperature
rise at the back surface after the pulse. The system uses Parker's method
to calculate thermal diffusivity. Parker's method assumes no heat loss
during the test. Although this assumption can generate a small systematic
error (3 to 5%) in thermal diffusivity, this technique was chosen because
of its simplicity, and more importantly because the main focus of the
present research with the experiment was on the variation from point
to point. Infrared images were acquired using a personal computer and
thermal diffusivity was calculated pixel by pixel. Figure 5 shows a
schematic diagram of infrared thermography testing to measure thermal
diffusivity of a composite material (Kim et al., 2003).

Figure 5 - Mapping thermal
diffusivity of SiC/SiC samples using the infrared thermography
flash technique (Kim et al., 2003).

Figure 6 - Computed tomography image of
the ceramic matrix composite (SiC/SiC) showing the observed material's
imperfections and other structural discontinuities.

Figure 7 - Computed tomography,
thermography and X-ray images of the ceramic matrix composite
(SiC/SiC) showing the observed material's imperfections and damage
due to impact.
Figures 6 and 7 show several results obtained via computed tomography,
X-radiography and infrared thermography. Figure 6 illustrates slices
of a ceramic specimen (Richerson, 1992) test section wherein several
key findings such as voids and surface roughness are indicated. Figure
7 represents results obtained for a composite specimen subjected to
an impact test using each of the techniques described. The agreement
between all of them is apparent (Martin et al., 2003).
Conclusion
The NDT techniques discussed in this paper offer a descriptive summary
of each technique and its application. The best approach is always the
one that provides the most efficient results for a given application.
A combination of two techniques often yields greater benefits,
provided that it is possible. Each one of these techniques has
advantages as well as limitations. The main advantages of ultrasonic
testing are its ability to investigate relatively thick materials and
that results can be obtained quickly. However, it requires water
immersion or some other type of acoustic coupling.
Advancements in computed tomography scanning are continuing. Newer
versions are being introduced which utilize flat panel area detectors
and cone beams. Among the advantages of computed tomography is that it
provides a cross-sectional view of the entire material. Infrared
thermography provides a noncontact technique providing accurate and
reliable data with the ability to image large areas at one time.
References
Abdul-Aziz, A., Louis J. Ghosn, George Baaklini and Ramakrishna Bhatt,
"A Combined NDE/Finite Element Technique to Study the Effects of
Matrix Porosity on the Behavior of Ceramic Matrix Composites," Proceedings
of SPIE: Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring of Aerospace
Materials and Composites II, Andrew L. Gyekenyesi and Peter J.
Shull, eds., Vol. 5046, 2003, pp. 144-151.
Bray, D.E. and D. McBride, Nondestructive Testing Techniques, New
York, John Wiley & Sons, 1992.
Cartz, L., Nondestructive Testing, Materials Park, Ohio, ASM
International, 1995.
Kim, Jeongguk and Peter K. Liaw, "The Nondestructive Evaluation of
Advanced Ceramics and Ceramic-matrix Composites," JOM, Vol. 50,
No. 11, 1998, pp. 1-15.
Kim, Jeongguk, Peter K. Liaw and Hsin Wang, "The NDE Analysis of Tension
Behavior in Nicalon/SiC Ceramic Matrix Composites," JOM, Vol.
55, No. 1, 2003, pp. 1-13, www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/0301/Kim/Kim-0301.html.
Martin, Richard E., Andrew L. Gyekenyesi and Steven M. Shepard, "Interpreting
the Results of Pulsed Thermography Data," Materials Evaluation,
Vol. 61, 2003, pp. 611-616.
Mix, P.E., Introduction to Nondestructive Testing, New York,
John Wiley & Sons, 1987.
Richerson, D.W., Modern Ceramic Engineering, second edition,
New York, Marcel Dekker, 1992.
Schwartz, M.M., Composite Materials, Vol. 1, Upper Saddle
River, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall, 1997.
* NASA Glenn Research Center, Optical
Instrumentation and NDE Branch, 21000 Brookpark Rd., MS 6-1,
Cleveland, OH 44135; (216) 433-6729; fax (216) 977-7150; e-mail <smaziz@grc.nasa.gov>.
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Nondestructive Testing, Inc. All
rights reserved.