|
Back to Basics[ click here for the Back to Basics Archive ]
The Radiographer's Eye
by Arthur Hoff*
|
In one of my industrial radiography classes
a radiographer with over 20 years of experience commented upon
one of my exposure setups, "Doc, that will work, but I can
make a better one." He could and he did. He was an artist
with an "eye" for process as described by this month's
author. Science and art - combined, they can't be beaten.
Frank Iddings
Tutorial Projects Editor
|
Basically,
radiography can be described as an examination that uses a beam of penetrating
electromagnetic radiation to create the shadow image of a specimen's
internal and external structure. Any examination that does not show
apparent discontinuities is meaningless, misleading, and can create
a false sense of security in a less than qualified product.
One of a radiographer's most important tools to
ensure that this doesn't happen is his "radiographers eye."
To examine an item properly, the radiographer should have an understanding
of the anomalies that could be present, and a grasp of the best way
to display them. The radiographer must be able to visualize the item's
projected image (shadow form) on a film or other recording medium.
Shadow formation is easy to understand. If a group
of people were to stand side by side in front of a wall and be illuminated
by an auto's headlight, the projected image (shadow) of the individual
most central to the beam would be true to his shape while the image
of the other individuals would become more and more distorted as their
distance from the center increased. If the same group of people were
to stand in front of a curved wall whose radius matched the distance
of the auto headlight to the wall, this would cause them all to "face"
the beam in the same manner: all their projected images would then be
true to shape.
This same condition of projection exists in radiographic
examination and can be controlled and manipulated by the radiographer
(see Figure 1). The beam of radiant energy
that will cast the X-ray shadow image of the item(s) being examined
comes from a very small focal spot and diverges as it gets farther from
its source, much like the auto headlight's beam.
Some specifications place specific limits on the
extent of beam angle deviation from the normal plane.
Visualizing the proper beam to component orientation can mean the difference
between imaging relevant indications or hiding them in the projected
shadow of other component details.
- Volumetric (100 percent) inspection of castings
is meaningless if the projected shadow of a large detail masks indications
in thinner areas.
- Inspection of a fusion weld is meaningless if
the part to beam orientation is such that lack of complete penetration
or fusion cannot be imaged.
- Shrinkage in a casting radiographed from the
wrong direction can appear to be a crack or hot tear. The definition
of fine line indications such as cracks, hot tears, and incomplete
penetration or fusion can be greatly affected if the beam is not orientated
correctly to the fissure interface.
Figure 1 - (a) Good geometry, (b) poor geometry.
Some specifications place specific limits on the
extent of beam angle deviation from the normal plane. This is especially
true for the examination of electron beam welds where little or no filler
material is used and preweld fit-up is so tight that an exposure taken
only a few degrees off parallel to the weld joint interface probably
would not show lack of fusion even in an unwelded joint!
If a radiographer were to position his head at the
radiation source, he would "see" the outcome of his radiographic
setup. By visualizing the projection of the image of the item(s) being
examined onto the recording medium, the radiographer can arrange the
items to ensure the best possible resultant image.
A proper setup of parts should not look like an
army of soldiers, all in straight lines and all facing the same way
This apparent neatness may look good when the setup is made but the
resultant image of each of the parts will be different because of the
projection caused by the small size of the radiation beam source and
its divergence. Often all the items being examined must be aligned to
"face" the beam in the same manner. The most important product
should be the X-ray image and not the neat appearance or convenience
of the straight line setup.
A simple method for proper imaging of small objects
when using film radiography is to curve the long dimension of the film
to match the arc of the source to film distance (SFD) and then position
the parts on the film. This small change (raising each end of the film
12 to 25 mm [0.5 to 1 in.] for a typical 1.2 to 1.5 m [48 to 60 in.]
SFD) allows the beam to impinge upon all objects positioned on the central
axis of the film at the same angle. The image of objects positioned
away from the central axis of the film will still be affected by distortion
Ñ but not as much as if the film were laying flat.
Some parts, though small, might best be examined
using only single row of parts or even a single piece placed in the
center of the beam and film
Radiographic examination is more than a science,
it is an art form that requires forethought and an ability to "see"
the image of a specimen even before the exposure is taken. In a world
where everything from cigars to storage tanks to space station components
is being examined, convenience is important, economics is important,
but using the proper set up to image all significant indications must
always take precedence.
- * 190 Bluebird
Drive, Naugatuck, CT 06770.
Copyright © 1999 by the American
Society for Nondestructive Testing, Inc. All rights reserved.
[ Materials Evaluation
]
Copyright © 2012 by the American Society for Nondestructive Testing, Inc. ASNT is not responsible for the authenticity or accuracy of information herein. Published opinions and statements do not necessarily reflect the opinion of ASNT. Products or services that are advertised or mentioned do not carry the endorsement or recommendation of ASNT.
IRRSP, NDT Handbook, The NDT Technician and www.asnt.org are trademarks of the American Society for Nondestructive Testing, Inc. ACCP, ASNT, Level III Study Guide, Materials Evaluation, Nondestructive Testing Handbook, Research in Nondestructive Evaluation and RNDE are registered trademarks of the American Society for Nondestructive Testing, Inc. ASNT exists to create a safer world by promoting the profession and technologies of nondestructive testing. |