In today's field of electronics, color coding is
essential. In the fabrication of highly stressed pressure vessels, the piping
and various assemblies are connected to each other and are usually assigned
particular color codes for what they convey and where they are going. Inspectors
with only a 38.9% acceptable color vision rating (having read 14 of 36 correct
plates) should not be considered acceptable. Stringent color vision testing is
necessary when safety is a major concern. In many cases, tests are carried out
at different stages of processing or fabrication in order to ensure that the
final product is safe for use.
Background
In 1966, a report was issued that described how the Navy
was attempting to design a method of testing personnel and placing them for
specific jobs (Paulson, 1966). Those who took the color vision tests and would
normally have been rejected by the pseudo-isochromatic plates could still be
deemed acceptable for some jobs. This routine testing was designed to pass those
with normal vision and fail all those who were color deficient. Ten percent of
the applicants failed. With the new tests described in the report, 30% of the
color deficient applicants were found to be acceptable for specific job
placements. These tests had been used since 1955.
The tests and equipment were developed for Navy use by
Commander Dean Farnsworth while he was stationed at the Naval Laboratory.
Subsequently, based on this work and the development of the "Farnsworth-Munsell
l00-Hue and Dichotomous Tests for Color Vision" (Farnsworth, 1943) and Deane B.
Judd's work (1943 and 1945), the Farnsworth Dichotomous Test for Color
Blindness, Panel D-15 (Farnsworth, 1947) was created. This test was designed to
distinguish the differences in visual ability between individuals who are
functionally colorblind or moderately color deficient and those having normal
color vision. Those individuals with color deficiencies can view similar hues
under variable conditions and see different colors. Red and green, blue and
green, blue and pink, yellow and blue, green and brown, and tan and amber are
some of the combinations that get mixed. The test was not designed to separate
the partially colorblind from those with normal vision nor to identify the color
aptitude of the persons with normal vision.
Likewise, selecting people for color matching, grading or
other work requiring special color differentiation would have to use
individualized special testing. The test can quickly separate individuals into
three categories: normal, colorblind and partially color deficient. The color
deficient group may further be subdivided into the color mix that they
misinterpret. Color discrimination begins to descend in desirability when using
northern daylight, daylight blue incandescent lamps, daylight fluorescents and
ordinary incandescent lamps. The testing of individuals with a moderate color
deficiency and the color range of indications all fall within the parameters of
their deficiencies. This alludes to a poor combination of color deficient
inspectors in an area where the colors are the most difficult for them to
identify. Whether the contrast ratio offsets the color deficiency of the
inhibited inspector has not yet been explored, but should not be forgotten.
Physiological Factors
There are two standard eye responses. At luminance levels above 3 cd/m2
(0.3 cd/ft2),
the eye's spectral response is primarily determined by the cone shaped
receptors of the retina and is called the photopic response. At luminance
levels much lower, such as 30 µcd/m2
(3 µcd/ft2),
the rod shaped receptors respond and they are more sensitive in the
blue color spectrum. This is called scotopic response. The rod receptors
are more sensitive to light than the cone receptors (Ness, 1987). Luminance
levels to which the eye responds with a variable spectral response are
called mesopic. They range from approximately 680 to 1746 lm/W. Observations
made utilizing the cone receptors require photopic conditions or the
foveal area of the retina, with the rod receptors at the near threshold
illumination level surrounding the center. Scotopic vision is not used
for color recognition while photopic vision is used. The fovea centralis
is an area of tightly packed cone receptors located in the optic center
of the retina. The area is surrounded by both rod and cone receptors
with the ratio of cones to rods decreasing with the increasing distance
from the fovea. Faint indications are seen better when indirectly viewed.
This is how a person in a darkened room uses peripheral vision and can
see to a better degree. The fovea becomes a blind spot when low luminance
and maximum sensitivity occur at approximately ten angular degrees from
the fovea center. The fovea itself has about 1 to 2 degrees in the visual
angular field (Figure 1).
The age of the inspector should also be considered.
With age, pupil size is reduced, as is the luminous flux at the retina.
This does not include contrast differences of the background reflectance
and the indication response. In Figures 2 and 3, the electromagnetic
spectrum is shown, with the visual spectrum of colors identified in
Figure 2 and the ultraviolet region shown in Figure 3. The near ultraviolet
A region, used as the light source for penetrant testing, is on the
side of the ultraviolet region bordering the visible spectrum. To a
normal observer, the color spectrum appears as a series of chromatic
colors, starting with the shortest wavelength and proceeding through
the longest color wavelength in the visible range of the electromagnetic
radiation spectrum: violet, indigo, blue, green, yellow, orange and
red.

Figure 1 - Components of
the human eye in cross section.
Figure 2 - The visual spectrum:
human eye response at 1070 lx (100 ftc).
Figure 3 - The electromagnetic
spectrum with an enlargement of the ultraviolet region.
Ultraviolet and Visible Spectra
Ultraviolet A is considered long wave and is not considered harmful
to the human eye. Ultraviolet B is considered middle wave and can cause
sunburn as well as be harmful to the eyes. Ultraviolet C is considered
short wave and is used for germicidal purposes and is harmful to the
eyes and body. Daylight viewing is considered to be a range of 540 through
570 nm (2.1 x 10-5
through 2.24 x 10-5
in.), with the average being 555 nm (2.19 x 10-5
in.). Toward either end of the visual range, brightness diminishes.
As the colors appear to diminish to either side of the average wavelength,
the luminosity function located at 555 nm (2.19 x 10-5
in.) diminishes with the color.
Colors in the visual range of any wavelength can be made
by mixing lights of the three basic colors (red, green and blue) in specific
proportions. These are the basic colors that account for normal vision being
classified as trichromatic. The normal observer may be classified to
discriminate light and dark, yellow/blue and red/green. An observer having
abnormal trichromatic vision requires a different mixture of the three colors to
see the same color as the normal observer. If the observer had mild trichromatic
abnormalities, his or her description of the created colors would be the same.
If the observer had extreme trichromatic abnormalities, the colors described
would be similar to those of a dichromatic, who would make the same
discriminations, but with one of the three lights at a lesser percentage,
usually red/green.
Testing for Color Vision Problems
There are two main types of trichromatic abnormalities,
called protanomaly and deuteranomaly. With either of these conditions,
inspectors could make color discrimination decisions with difficulty, while a
dichromatic could not. The inspector with protanomaly of all degrees is
deficient at the long wave end of the spectrum due to a loss of luminosity
function. Trichromatic and deutermatic inspectors have a luminosity function
within normal limits. Dichromatic observers require just two color wavelengths
to be mixed to form a wavelength color that may be discriminated. They can make
only two types of visual decisions. One is achromatic (light/dark) and the other
is chromatic (either yellow/blue or red/green, usually the former). Dichromatic
observers are limited in their visual range and they would not pass the color
vision requirements given by an optometrist.
Today, the method of testing individuals for color vision
capabilities relies on the Farnsworth-Munsell 100 Hue Test for the Examination
of Color Discrimination (Farnsworth, 1957). It encompasses all phases of color
vision. The Farnsworth Dichotomous Test for Color Blindness, Panel D-15
(Farnsworth, 1947) covers only a portion. Fifteen different color paper disks of
12.7 mm (0.5 in.) diameter are sunk 2.5 mm (0.1 in.) below the 2.5 mm (0.1 in.)
rim of plastic caps. The backs are numbered sequentially. A box with a terminal
color is fixed at one end of the box. The candidate is given the 15 colored caps
in a random mix and is required to match them in consecutive order to the
terminal color without looking at the numbers on the caps. About 80% of adult
males make fewer than 12 transpositions, most of which are simple two cap
exchanges. These errors are random, seldom reoccur on retests and are not
restricted to one region of the color scheme. The instruction booklet that
accompanies the box of caps has all the information required for a qualified
test of vision status. It can define the area of the colors that may be missed,
therefore limiting the type of test that could be performed. All the noted
testing is performed using white light of about 6500 K (11 200 ºF), average
daylight.
Individuals have variations in their spectral responses,
therefore setting up a single standard to which they would have to comply would
be quite difficult. Any standards being used must be able to encompass all of
the shortcomings of an individual inspector but be strict to the point that any
test will be capable of detecting vision problems that cause harmful conditions
in the use or operation of the article being tested.
Color Discrimination and Penetrant Testing
Fluorescent penetrant testing is carried out in a secluded
area where the ambient room lighting is controlled to less than 21.5 lx (2 ftc)
of white light. Total darkness is never achieved. The sensitivity of
discontinuity detection is controlled by the inspector's limitations, which may
include protective eyewear, reflective clothes, reflected near ultraviolet light
from the part surface, the angular reflections of the discontinuities and their
size and quantity of luminescence based on the type of penetrant used. The
nature of fluorescent penetrant testing raises the question as to whether an
individual with color deficiencies may make more errors when performing a test
of fluorescent indications as viewed under near ultraviolet illumination than
would an inspector with normal vision.
The viewing of fluorescent indications is done using a mercury
vapor lamp and a blue/purple filter. That allows only light at a wavelength
of 365 nm (1.4 ´ 10-5
in.) to be used. The fluorescent dye that makes up indications is yellow.
There are other dyes that may be used for special applications, such
as red, orange, blue or green. These color groups are the ones that
confuse the moderate color deficient individuals. Fluorescence, also
know as "cold light," may occur in gases, liquids or solids. When the
material is radiated by the ultraviolet lamp, the energy excitement
causes a secondary emission of longer wavelengths to be emitted from
the material. In this case, the material is a liquid that has been applied
to an object and allowed sufficient time to seek out discontinuities
that are open to the surface. Capillary action carries the fluid into
the discontinuity. When the surface residue has been removed, the only
fluorescent fluid left is that which entered the discontinuity. With
time, the fluid will again, by capillary action, creep out to be exposed
on the surface. In order to make the fluid easier to detect, a blotting
powder may be applied to the surface (it acts like a sponge placed on
a spill.) This coverage also acts as a contrasting background. The ultraviolet
testing lamp is held at approximately 305 to 381 mm (12 to 15 in.) from
the test surface and has a radiation value of 1200 µw/cm2.
The contrast ratio is much higher than it would be under normal daylight
test conditions.
Conclusion
Based on the research performed, nothing was located to
show that any recent work has been done involving the testing of color vision
utilizing fluorescent materials and ultraviolet illumination. Quite by chance,
contact was made with the newly developed Eye Institute of the Cleveland Clinic
Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio. They were not aware of any new developments in this
direction, but they are doing some work in the color vision area. Perhaps they
may get new data regarding the use of color deficient persons in NDT.
REFERENCES
Farnsworth, Dean, "The Farnsworth-Munsell 100-Hue and
Dichotomous Tests for Color Vision," Journal of the Optical Society of
America,
Vol. 33, No. 10, October 1943, pp. 568-578.
Farnsworth, Dean, The Farnsworth Dichotomous Test for
Color Blindness, Panel D-I5, New York, Psychological Corporation, 1947.
Farnsworth, Dean, The Farnsworth-Munsell 100 Hue Test for
the Examination of Color Discrimination, Baltimore, Maryland, Munsell Color
Company, 1957.
Judd, Deane B., "Facts of Color Blindness," Journal of
the Optical Society of America, Vol. 33, No. 6, June 1943, pp. 294-306.
Judd, Deane B., "Standard Response Functions for
Protanopic and Deuteranopic Vision," Journal of the Optical Society of America,
Vol. 35, No. 3, 1945, pp. 199-219.
Ness, Stanley, "White Light/Visible in the I/II Dye
Penetrant and Fluorescent/Non-fluorescent Magnetic Particle NDT Inspection
Processes," Visual Committee Report, American Society for Nondestructive
Testing Fall Conference 1987, Columbus, Ohio, ASNT, pp. 1-8.
Paulson, Helen M., The Performance of the Farnsworth
Lantern at the Submarine Medical Research Laboratory and in the Field from 1955
to 1965, Report Number 466, US Naval Submarine Medical Center, Submarine Base,
Groton, Connecticut, 1966.
* 1162 Dover Center
Road, Westlake, OH 44145-1315; (440) 835-4017; e-mail <wbailey@quack.nacs.net>.
Copyright ©
2003 by the American Society for Nondestructive Testing, Inc. All
rights reserved.