Introduction
A method for extracting information from pulsed eddy current tests
is described. A personal computer is used to analyze and identify conditions
in the test specimen that affect the eddy current field flowing within
it. The computer analyzes the results in real time and presents them
on the screen and/or printer. The computer is easily trained to recognize
those conditions in the test specimen that are of interest to the operator.
It also compensates for liftoff or other nuisance conditions that are
not of interest. If conditions are encountered in which the computer
has not been trained, it identifies the known condition closest to the
unknown condition that has been encountered.
A Brief History
of the Use of Pulsed Eddy Currents as a Method of Nondestructive Testing
Pulsed eddy currents were first used by Donald Waidelich of the
University of Missouri early in the 1950s. They were subsequently used
for nondestructive testing in the then fledgling nuclear industry, especially
in the testing of fuel elements, pin jackets and heat exchanger tubing
for various research and experimental reactors that were under construction
at that time. The method was also used in the analysis of experimental
fuel element performance after irradiation, with the tests being performed
on the highly radioactive fuel elements in hot cells. At that time various
papers appeared in the literature (Renken and Sather, 1972; Waidelich
and Huang, 1972). Since then, the method has been used for many applications
all over the world and the bibliography of all the papers that have
been published on the subject is very extensive (AEA National NDT Centre).
The
use of a
pulse produces various advantages over the sinusoidal waveform and
some disadvantages.
Characteristics of Pulsed Eddy Current Testing
Pulsed eddy current testing differs from sinusoidal eddy current
testing in that a pulse of current is induced in the metal test specimen
instead of the sinusoidally varying current used in single frequency
or multiple frequency eddy current testing. The use of a pulse produces
various advantages over the sinusoidal waveform and some disadvantages.
In theory, a pulse can be analyzed into an infinite train of sinusoidal
waveforms that are related harmonically. This means that all the information
that could be obtained from a large number of sinusoidal tests at various
frequencies is already available to the pulsed eddy
current test equipment. Since the pulse usually has a short duration
compared to the duration of the duty cycle, the pulse can be relatively
powerful without excessively heating the test probe. On the other hand,
wideband electronics are needed to handle the pulse. This wideband circuitry
is more susceptible to electronic noise than the narrow band circuitry
that can be used by sinusoidal eddy current equipment.
As in all eddy current tests, a
current field is induced in the specimen that is to be tested, usually
by a current carrying coil called the field coil. The field in the test
specimen is detected by a current induced in another coil called the
pickup coil. Sometimes a Hall detector is used for this purpose. Often
equipment is designed so that one coil acts both as field coil and pickup
coil. In all cases, changes in the field in the test specimen caused
by physical or conductivity variations in the test specimen are what
the eddy current equipment must then process and present as useful information
to the operator. In far effect eddy current tests, the pickup coil is
purposely located a significant distance from the field coil, but the
equipment described here uses a pickup coil very close to the field
coil.
The pulsed field that the field
coil induces in the test specimen travels relatively slowly into the
metal test specimen. We are not dealing with a wave phenomenon here
like that which occurs in an ultrasonic test. Rather, the diffusion
of the current in the metal is much more analogous to the diffusion
of heat into a conducting medium. In fact, the same equations can be
used to describe both actions. The metal acts as a dissipative medium,
weakening the current field rapidly and changing its shape as a function
of time. This makes a rigorous definition of the velocity of the pulse
in the specimen difficult. The diffusion of current is much faster than
the diffusion of heat in the same medium, however.
Equipment Description
The equipment described here uses a separate field coil and pickup
coil that are located immediately adjacent to each other. The voltage
that drives the field coil as it appears on an oscilloscope is shown
in Figure 1a. The current in the field coil has practically the same
shape since the impedance of the field coil at all frequencies of interest
is very low. In this case, the test probe was of the type intended to
test tubes from the inside as is done in tests on the condensers used
in steam power plants, or on the steam generators used in pressurized
water reactors. The voltage appearing across the pickup is shown in
Figure 1b when the test probe is located outside a tube. This voltage
is reduced to a minimal level by the use of an auxiliary coil which
bucks out the strong direct field from the field coil. The voltage across
the pickup when the test probe is inside a tube is shown in Figure 1c.
It is essentially the first derivative of the flux outside the tube
that is generated by the pulsed current flowing in the metal. In this
case, both field coil and pickup consist of a few turns of fine wire
coaxial to each other and immediately adjacent. The combined length
of the whole assembly is about 1.5 mm (0.06 in.).

Figure 1 Oscilloscope
traces that are observed when a test probe designed to test tubes
from the inside is used: (a) voltage across the field coil; (b)
probe outside the tube; (c) probe inside the tube. The dotted line
is obtained when the wall thickness is 1.78 mm (0.07 in.). The vertical
scale is 0.2 V per division. The horizontal scale is 20 ms per division.
The tube has an inner diameter of 12.7 mm (0.5 in.) and a wall thickness
of 0.89 mm (0.04 in.).
Time Sampling
Information theory teaches that a pulse may be reproduced to an arbitrarily
high accuracy if its amplitude is known at a sufficient number of points
in time during the duration of the pulse cycle. This means that if one
can measure the pulse amplitude at various points along the pulse, one
can obtain essentially all the information that the pulse may be carrying
provided that the amplitudes at the various sampling points can be interpreted.
The basic approach used with this equipment is to obtain the amplitudes
of the field coil pulse at a sufficient number of sampling points and
program a personal computer to interpret the results. The amplitude
of the pickup pulse at various sampling points is obtained by the use
of sampling pulses. These are high amplitude, very narrow pulses of
0.05 ms that are superimposed on the pickup pulse at various points.
The combined amplitudes of sampling pulse and pickup pulse at a particular
time are then measured by the electronic circuitry and presented as
a filtered analog voltage. This equipment samples at five different
points and so it produces five outputs which may be called sample voltages.
Processing of the Sample Voltages
The five analog voltages must first be converted to digital form
before they can be used by the computer. The conversion is accomplished
by a multiplexing analog to digital converter which samples each of
the five output signals in turn and converts each into a digital number
with a resolution of 8 bits. The sampling is very rapid compared to
the pulse repetition rate, so in effect the computer always has available
the latest information developed by the driving pulse. The five digital
signals are fed to the computer via the parallel port. It is the fastest
port on most personal computers.
Interpretation of the Signal Voltages
The set of five signal voltages this equipment produces, which contain
information derived from the voltage pulse developed across the pickup,
may be regarded as a number set, or as a pattern in a five dimensional
space. The later concept was used in developing the program that interprets
the patterns. To the extent that the patterns are located in different
locations in the pattern space the computer is able to distinguish between
them. To make this concept clearer, it is helpful to closely inspect
Table 1. Table 1 shows the values of the five signals developed by various
conditions in the test specimen, in this case, a copper tube of 12.8
mm (0.5 in.) inner diameter and 0.89 mm (0.04 in.) wall. The amplitudes
are the digital values produced by the pattern recognition program.
The times are the sample points of the pulse developed across the pickup
coil. The top entry is labeled as the standard. A standard plays no
important role in the test. It is merely a location exhibiting no noticeable
anomalies where the liftoff compensation can be developed. In this case,
liftoff was introduced merely by tilting the loosely fitting test probe
into an atypical position within the tube. At this point one of the
advantages of the pulsed eddy current method should be pointed out.
If the driving pulse has a fast risetime and the equipment bandwidth
is sufficient to preserve the steep leading edge of the pickup pulse,
the sample point at time = 0 is essentially sensitive only to liftoff
and sample conductivity, and is relatively insensitive to the latter.
This fortunate circumstance allows the computer program to compensate
for liftoff automatically. The reason for these phenomena is that the
steep leading edge of the pickup pulse waveform is developed mainly
by the high frequency components of the current in the specimen. These
components stay very close to the surface and are reflected back to
the pickup immediately. In practice, one has only to introduce some
reasonable value of liftoff, press a key on the computer and the liftoff
compensation is then introduced automatically in subsequent tests. The
entries in Table 1 after entry two are all liftoff compensated.
Training the Computer
The computer is trained to interpret the patterns by the operator. The
test probe is positioned over some tube condition of interest and the
description of the condition is typed into the computer. From then on
as it runs the pattern recognition program the computer will recognize
the condition when it is encountered and the description will appear
on the computer screen. It continually analyzes the patterns that are
presented at its input and attempts to match them to the patterns stored
in the memory. If it cannot achieve a match, it presents the closest
available pattern and the distance to it in pattern space. If the match
is sufficiently poor, it identifies the pattern as an unknown pattern.
Table 1 shows a simple example of what a pattern file looks like. Note
that the conditions labeled "headers" are not actual headers in a condenser
or steam generator but are simulations achieved by fitting a narrow,
close fitting, thick copper sleeve over the outside of the tube.
Table 2 shows the pattern file for
another type of specimen. The test probe in this case was a point probe
intended for the testing of flat or nearly flat plates. The specimens
are intended to simulate aircraft skin. They consist of various aluminum
plates of varying thickness. Some of them are sandwiched together and
secured by rivets.
| Table
1 The set of five signal voltage amplitudes developed by
various conditions in a copper tube of 12.8 mm (0.5 in.) inner
diameter and 0.89 mm (0.04 in.) wall |
|
| Condition
in the Tube |
Time (µs) |
|
|
0 |
45 |
95 |
120 |
160 |
|
Standard |
47 |
49 |
51 |
39 |
39 |
|
Liftoff |
70 |
42 |
79 |
30 |
41 |
|
Typical tube |
47 |
49 |
47 |
40 |
39 |
|
Header, edge one
Header, edge
two 47 55 46 2 57 |
47 |
21 |
60 |
133 |
42 |
|
Header, center |
47 |
36 |
55 |
65 |
51 |
|
0.3 mm (0.01 in.) through hole |
47 |
39 |
51 |
41 |
38 |
|
Header center, soldered |
47 |
39 |
51 |
60 |
57 |
|
1.6 mm (0.06 in.) wide 1.3 mm (0.05 in.)
groove on the outside surface |
47 |
39 |
50 |
38 |
34 |
|
|
Table 2 The set of five signal voltage amplitudes developed
by various conditions in simulated aircraft skin consisting
of various aluminum plates of varying thickness, some sandwiched
together and secured by rivets |
|
| Condition
in the Plates |
Time (µs) |
| |
0 |
45 |
95 |
120 |
160 |
|
Standard 1.3 mm (0.05 in.) aluminum plate |
115 |
107 |
124 |
101 |
117 |
|
Liftoff (0.25 mm [0.01 in.]) |
105 |
104 |
111 |
93 |
106 |
|
Two 1.6 mm (0.06 in.) plates
sandwiched together |
115 |
95 |
121 |
117 |
85 |
|
1.3 mm (0.05 in.) and 0.6 mm (0.02 in.)
plates sandwiched together |
115 |
107 |
124 |
101 |
117 |
|
0.9 mm (0.04 in.) aluminum plate |
115 |
108 |
121 |
55 |
138 |
|
Two 0.8 mm (0.03 in.) plates
sandwiched together |
115 |
108 |
128 |
109 |
122 |
|
Corrosion between 1.6 mm (0.06 in.) plates |
115 |
99 |
122 |
123 |
91 |
|
Two 1.6 mm (0.06 in.) plates sandwiched
together with crack in the lower plate |
115 |
94 |
121 |
125 |
83 |
|
Header center, soldered |
47 |
39 |
51 |
60 |
57 |
|
1.6 mm (0.06 in.) wide 1.3 mm (0.05 in.)
groove on the outside surface |
47 |
39 |
50 |
38 |
34 |
|
Conclusion
The information developed by the pulsed eddy current method allows
the application of automatic pattern recognition as performed by a personal
computer. The equipment is relatively simple, stable and adaptable to
a wide variety of test probes and specimens.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank Dean Froerer and Terry Vallon of
Boeing, for providing some of the specimens used in the research of
this paper.
References
AEA National NDT Centre, NDT Abstracts, Oxon, England, AEA.
Renken, C.J. and Allen Sather, "A
Pulsed Eddy Current Test System for Hot Cell Use: Manual of Operation,"
ANL 7973, Argonne, Illinois, Argonne National Laboratory, 1972.
Waidelich, D.L. and S.C. Huang,
"The Use of Crossing Points in Pulsed Eddy Current Testing," Materials
Evaluation, Vol. 30, No. 1, January 1972, pp. 20-24.