|
Back to Basics [ click here for the Back to Basics Archive ]
What is Basics?
by Frank A. Iddings*
|
I get questions. Mostly, they boil down to "what is
basic?" What I have tried to do this month is give my answer to that question
in the form of a short article. This is certainly not a standard or a law carved
into stone, but it may be something that will help you develop your own answer
to the question.
Frank Iddings
Tutorial Projects Editor
|
Introduction
What are the basics for nondestructive testing (NDT)? The
number of different answers would probably equal the number of people answering
and they could all be correct in terms of how the individual was involved in
NDT. Certainly the basics include the physical laws that are involved, the
fundamentals of each method and the rules of thumb that we follow because they
work. In addition, there are the properties of the materials being tested, a
knowledge of the fabrication techniques involved, the influence of a
discontinuity that causes it to become classifiable as a flaw, how well the
selected technique works and so on and so forth.
Do the basics include everything? No, but there are a lot
of things that are basic. Does it seem there are more things that are basic than
there used to be? Yes, I think so. That is because there are more complicated
problems to solve, more difficult materials to test and more demanding criteria
to be met. The world has changed and in many respects it has not gotten easier
to do NDT. However, we do have better equipment and some new and more
sophisticated methods (and, hence, more and different basics to master!). To
have the improved inspectors to go with the new methods, we must have inspectors
who are really good with the basics as well as all of the details that go into
doing a job well.
Definition and Synonyms
So what are the basics (at least as I see them)? Let's
start with a definition and the synonyms for "the basics." My working
definition - developed during my 40 years in this field - is that the basics
are the necessary information that allows you to understand how a technique
works, permits you to perform the inspection and gives you the ability to
evaluate the useful integrity of the specimen. Of course, there are also a lot
of details that are not basic that come into play as well. To me, however,
omitting a basic results in fatally flawed NDT.
To me, something is basic if you need to know it to do the
job correctly, reliably and safely.
Looking at some of the synonyms of the word "basic"
should help us better understand what the basics are in NDT. These synonyms
include such words as "crucial," "fundamental," "important,"
"indispensable," "major," "necessary" and "vital." When we satisfy these
words, we satisfy the basics. Substitute these words when you think of basics
and you will begin to feel about the basics of NDT as I do.
Knowledge
Knowing that there are basics is not enough. You must know
the basics and have enough experience applying them that they become second
nature to you. That is asking you to know a lot. There are the fundamentals of
the technique, properties of the materials, fabrication effects on the
materials, service use effects, differences between discontinuities and flaws
(as well as knowing when an indication is one or the other) and knowing how
reliable your information is. This means asking you to know about probability of
detection for the procedure you are doing in appropriate circumstances.
Something new has been added to our basics, again. You also must know when you
need to know these things. Knowing how to do some NDT is not enough. You must
know if it is properly done to answer the question: "Is this specimen
satisfactory to perform its designed task for the time required?" That used to
be an easier question to answer. The basics needed were simpler, too.
Knowledge of how to do the job safely is also basic. The
theme of an early "Back to Basics" column was that nondestructive testing
should not only be nondestructive to the material or component being tested, but
be nondestructive to the inspector and to the public as well. As I wrote at the
time, "safety is just as basic to the nondestructive test as are good results
and good interpretations. Certainly safety without results and interpretation is
worthless but the reverse is equally true" (Iddings, 1979). While a lot has
changed since I wrote this in 1979, this remains true today.
Conclusion
Does it begin to sound like basics are all inclusive? Some
things, like the fundamentals of a technique, always are. Some things may or may
not be depending upon the circumstances. Other things never are. Who signs your
time sheet is important but not basic. Leaving out something basic would be the
same as cutting off a leg on a three legged stool. It won't work right that
way.
To me, something is basic if you need to know it to do the
job correctly, reliably and safely. I hope that comes close to what basic means
in NDT to you.
References
Iddings, Frank A., "Editorial," Materials Evaluation,
Vol. 37, No. 11 (October 1979), p. 20.
* 1635 Rob Roy
Lane, San Antonio, TX 78251; (210) 647-7717; e-mail <profiddings@satx.rr.com>.
Copyright ©
2002 by the American Society for Nondestructive Testing, Inc. All
rights reserved.
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Nondestructive Testing, Inc. ASNT is not responsible for the authenticity or accuracy of information herein. Published opinions and statements do not necessarily reflect the opinion of ASNT. Products or services that are advertised or mentioned do not carry the endorsement or recommendation of ASNT.
IRRSP, NDT Handbook, The NDT Technician and www.asnt.org are trademarks of the American Society for Nondestructive Testing, Inc. ACCP, ASNT, Level III Study Guide, Materials Evaluation, Nondestructive Testing Handbook, Research in Nondestructive Evaluation and RNDE are registered trademarks of the American Society for Nondestructive Testing, Inc.
ASNT exists to create a safer world by promoting the profession and technologies
of nondestructive testing.
|