|
Back to Basics
Volumetric X-Ray Testing
by Harold Berger*
and Robert L. Schulte*
|
As radiographic techniques become
more sophisticated to solve more sophisticated problems, the basics
of the technique become more complicated. Here is a great explanation
of how one of the new imaging techniques, tomography, works. Berger
and Schulte give a really short and to the point explanation -
and without the pages of math usually found in such articles.
The photographs of how it works are worth many thousands of words
that would never have done the job - at least for me.
Frank Iddings
Tutorial Projects Editor
|
Introduction
Most radiographers
have come across an X-ray testing problem that was not solved by a conventional
two dimensional X-ray image. The information sought was hidden behind
other structures in the object. If the system was a realtime radioscopic
system, the information might be obtained (or might not, depending on
the geometry) by rotating the object in the beam while the test was
being conducted. However, many installed X-ray testing systems, even
realtime radioscopic systems, don't have the necessary object rotation
capability. In these cases, the desired information may be obtained
by a repositioning of the object in the beam, perhaps several times,
to see the desired X-ray image detail. An alternative to this approach
is a volumetric X-ray imaging system. Volumetric X-ray image techniques
have existed for some time (Ellingson and Berger, 1980), but many X-ray
people will think first about computed tomography (ASTM International,
1997; Bossi, 1996). However, there are many testing situations where
the size, shape or location of the object is not suitable for testing
using computed tomography methods.
Images
of any region of a testing object can be obtained quickly and
easily with volumetric X-ray systems.
There are various
terms that have been used to describe the process of creating a useful
X-ray image of a selected plane within an object. Planigraphy and laminography
are some of the older terms used for this process of bringing a selected
plane in the object into good focus. The technique was used for many
years in the medical community (Plantes, 1932). In the simplest form,
the object remained stationary while the X-ray source was moved linearly
in the +X direction and the imaging detector (usually film) was moved
at the same time and rate in the -X direction. This resulted in a single
image plane in the object (the fulcrum plane) remaining in focus while
images from other object planes were blurred along the direction of
the source detector movement. The process could be repeated to image
other object image planes. The motion for the source detector movement
may also be more complicated than the simple linear motion described;
the blurring of out of plane detail is more effective when more complex
source detector movements are used. For example, circular or hypocycloidal
motions provide images of the desired object plane with less blurring
from out of plane object details.
The terms used to describe this process
for computer methods are "tomography" and "tomosynthesis." Tomography
is defined in ASTM E-1316 (1999) as follows: "any radiologic
technique that provides an image of a selected plane in an object to
the relative exclusion of structures that lie outside the plane of interest."
Tomosynthesis is normally used to describe a technique in which the
X-rays are directed through the object in a limited number of views,
with the objective of reconstructing multiple image planes within the
object.
Computed tomography is widely used
in the medical community and is receiving increased attention from industrial
users. Computed tomography systems are usually configured to take many
views of the object, often more than 100; this provides reconstructed
images of good quality, with excellent density discrimination. Limited
view tomosynthetic techniques are beginning to attract attention from
a number of investigators, many of whom are taking advantage of new,
semiconductor digital imaging detectors - particularly flat panels (Antonuk,
1995; Jones and Berger, 2000; Jones, 2001). Many reports on advances
in computed tomography and tomosynthesis X-ray imaging are described
in recent symposium proceedings (Antonuk and Yaffe, 2001; Boone and
Dobbins, 1999; Dobbins and Boone, 2000). These advanced techniques have
also been described at the recent series of ASNT topical meetings on
digital imaging (for example, see American Society for Nondestructive
Testing, 2001).
An example of an advanced volumetric
X-ray testing technique is an all electronic, digital, multiimage technique
that permits an operator to reconstruct any horizontal or vertical X-ray
image plane in the object (Schulte et al., 2001; Schulte 2001; Schulte,
2002). This capability allows the viewer to look behind obstructing
details that may hide the testing region of interest. The operator also
has the capability to scan through selected regions of the object in
both the horizontal and vertical directions. Since an integral part
of this system is an immediate response (realtime radioscopic capability),
the operator can view the usual two dimensional X-ray image and decide
if more information is needed to complete the test. If that is the case,
additional images can be taken while the testing object is in place
to provide the volumetric images needed to complete the test.
Volumetric Imaging System
A simple system for stereo imaging requires only two images taken from
angles that permit stereo image viewing. X-ray image stereo viewing
can be accomplished with film or filmlike detectors (American Society
for Nondestructive Testing, 1985; Evans and Robinson, 2000) or in realtime
radioscopy by rapid movement of the
X-ray focal spot in a microfocus X-ray
tube (Polansky et al., 1990). However, more than two X-ray views are
required for reconstruction of multiple X-ray image planes within an
object. True tomosynthesis X-ray systems for viewing of multiple image
planes require more than two X-ray images and provide much more image
information. The system, like all tomosynthesis techniques, makes use
of multiple two dimensional X-ray images taken from different perspectives.
The tomosynthesis process requires
a series of projection X-ray images taken from different angles through
the test object. A schematic of the technique is shown in Figure 1.
(Jones and Berger, 2000; Schulte et al., 2001; Schulte, 2001). A typical
testing geometry is shown with the source located at an oblique angle
with respect to the vertical direction. The object under test is rotated
to eight different positions and an X-ray
image is acquired at each position. The process is very flexible and
is not constrained to any specific positions, number of images or geometry.
The circular image pattern, however, is convenient to demonstrate the
technique. The image detector can be any flat detector, film, scintillator
or flat panel. The flat panel, as used in this system, provides rapid
response, excellent dynamic range and digital images for input to the
reconstruction software. In this case, eight two dimensional digital
images are collected, showing details in the testing object from the
different image perspectives. Any view through the object can be reconstructed
with software using the basic set of oblique incidence images acquired
during the X-ray test.
After acquiring the limited X-ray image
data set, the application software is used to reconstruct views of any
horizontal X-ray image plane parallel to the flat panel image detector
face. In addition, the software can display any vertical X-ray image
plane (perpendicular to the flat panel face). The reconstructed X-ray
image planes provide an excellent dimensional measurement capability
with the accuracy dependent on the resolution of the image detector.
An interesting feature of the application software is a realtime scan
through the X-ray image planes. This dynamic display of internal
X-ray images is very useful. It allows an operator
to look rapidly through the X-ray image volume of the object, stop at
any point and reconstruct the entire X-ray image plane at that level.
This dynamic response can't be shown in a hard copy article, but several
examples of reconstructed X-ray images are shown in the following section.

Figure 1 - Schematic drawing
showing the multiview oblique incidence technique of tomosynthesis.
The X-ray view illustrated shows the projection of a discontinuity
onto the detector plane. The X-ray images acquired at each position
have the discontinuity projected to a different location on the
detector plate.
Applications
A tomosynthetic examination of a test object can be used to illustrate
the power of this technique. Two aluminum plates were prepared - each
12.7 mm (0.5 in.) thick plate contains a pair of flat bottom 3.175 mm
(0.125 in.) diameter holes at various depths. The plates were assembled
into a single 25 mm (1 in.) thick object with the hole openings facing
the interface between the two plates. Reconstructed horizontal X-ray
images of each plate show only the holes in that plate. Figure 2 shows
horizontal views at two different levels within the assembled plate
object. Figure 2a shows a horizontal X-ray image view at a level of
10 mm (0.4 in.) above the detector plane, well within the lower aluminum
block (two holes are shown). Figure 2b, taken at 15 mm (0.6 in.), shows
only the other two holes in the upper block. A cross sectional view
of the plates can be obtained through a vertical image reconstruction.
Figure 3 shows the horizontal view at the interface of the two plates
at which each of the four holes is just visible. Using the application
software, a multisegment line is drawn over all the holes, as is shown
in Figure 3. A vertical reconstruction is made along the line segments,
starting in the upper right corner (Figure 4). The image is a cross
section of the stacked plates showing all of the holes as a function
of depth; the holes in each plate extend only to the interface between
the plates. The diameters and depths
of all the holes can be measured with precision on the order of 127
µm (5 x 10-3
in.).
The test object described above illustrates
what can be done with this tomosynthesis X-ray imaging system. A practical
application of X-ray tomosynthetic imaging is weld testing. The horizontal
and/or vertical X-ray reconstructed images provide excellent location
information about weld discontinuities. This, coupled with the capability
for dimensional measurement, gives an inspector the information needed
to decide about repair and from which side of the weld to start. Figure
5 shows a horizontal X-ray image reconstruction through a butt weld
of two 12.7 mm (0.5 in.) thick aluminum plates with a single V groove.
The total thickness of the weld is 18 mm (0.7 in.). This horizontal
image, at a level of 16 mm (0.63 in.) is just below the level of the
plates, showing discontinuities (a pore and inclusions) in the weld
bead. A vertical X-ray image (Figure 6) reconstructed along the direction
of the weld and through the center of the pore shows the size and location
of the pore. This information makes it easier to assess the quality
of the weld.
| (a) |
|
(b) |
 |
Figure 2 - Horizontal views
at two different levels within the assembled plate object: (a) horizontal
X-ray image through the bottom plate (at 10 mm [0.4 in.]) of the
25 mm (1 in.) thick aluminum plate assembly, showing only the holes
in the lower plate; (b) horizontal X-ray image at 15 mm (0.6 in.),
showing the two holes in the upper plate.

Figure 3 - A horizontal X-ray
image at the interface of the two aluminum plates, showing the Z
configuration line for reconstruction of a vertical view through
the thickness of the assembly.

Figure 4 - A vertical
(cross sectional) image taken along the Z configuration line shown
in Figure 3, showing the image of all four holes, two in each block
along the interface between the blocks.

Figure 5 - Horizontal
X-ray image of aluminum weld, taken at a height of 16 mm (0.63 in.)
above the bottom of the weld. A pore is located in the upper left
side of the weld area. Tungsten inclusions are also visible at this
level.

Figure 6 - A vertical
X-ray image taken through the pore shows the vertical image of the
pore. The dimensions of the pore, height and diameter can be measured
with high precision.
Conclusion
Full volumetric X-ray images provide additional information for the
detection and characterization of discontinuities or components in all
kinds of structures, including welds, castings, electronic devices and
electromechanical assemblies. Use of a digital flat panel provides high
sensitivity, fast response and good resolution. Images of any region
of a testing object can be obtained quickly and easily with volumetric
X-ray systems. This includes systems such as the electronic X-ray system
described in this article. Compared to other volumetric X-ray image
systems, the X-ray system offers advantages, including reconstructed
viewing of any horizontal or vertical X-ray image plane, scanning through
selected horizontal or vertical image regions and a precision measurement
capability. Volumetric X-ray imaging, using methods such as tomosynthesis
or computed tomography, can provide the additional information often
needed for critical nondestructive testing applications.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Donald Twyman, of the Digitome Corporation,
for his assistance with the preparation and review of the paper.
References
American Society for Nondestructive Testing, Digital Imaging IV,
Columbus, Ohio, ASNT, 2001.
American Society for Nondestructive
Testing, "Radiographic Flaw Depth Determination," Nondestructive
Testing Handbook, second edition: Volume 3, Radiography and
Radiation Testing, L.E. Bryant and P. McIntire, eds., Columbus,
Ohio, ASNT, 1985, pp. 808-816.
Antonuk, L.E., "Flat-panel Horizons
in Digital X-Ray Imaging," Photonics Spectra, Vol. 29, No. 6,
1995, pp. 108-116.
Antonuk, L.E. and M.J. Yaffe, eds.,
Medical Imaging 2001: Physics of Medical Imaging, Proceedings of
SPIE, Vol. 4320, 2001.
ASTM International, ASTM E-1441,
Standard Guide for Computed Tomography (CT) Imaging, West Conshohocken,
Pennsylvania, ASTM International, 1997.
ASTM International, ASTM E-1316,
Standard Terminology for Nondestructive Examinations, West Conshohocken,
Pennsylvania, ASTM International, 1999.
Boone, J.M. and J.T. Dobbins, III,
eds., Medical Imaging 1999: Physics of Medical Imaging, Proceedings
of SPIE, Vol. 3659, 1999.
Bossi, R.H., "Radioscopy and Tomography,"
Nondestructive Testing Handbook, second edition: Volume 10,
Nondestructive Testing Overview, S. Ness, C.N. Sherlock, P.O.
Moore and P. McIntire, eds., Columbus, Ohio, American Society for Nondestructive
Testing, 1996, pp. 173-198.
Dobbins, J.T., III, and J.M. Boone,
eds., Medical Physics 2000 - Physics Medical Imaging, Proceedings
of SPIE, Vol. 3977, 2000.
Ellingson, W.A. and H. Berger, "Three-Dimensional
Radiographic Imaging," Research Techniques in Nondestructive Testing,
R.S. Sharpe, ed., London, Academic Press, Vol. 4, 1980, pp. 1-38.
Evans, J.P.O. and M. Robinson, "Design
of a Stereoscopic X-Ray Imaging System Using a Single X-Ray Source,"
NDT&E International, Vol. 33, 2000, pp. 325-332.
Jones, T.S. and H. Berger, "Performance
Characteristics of an Electronic Three-Dimensional Radiographic Technique,"
ASNT Spring Conference and 9th Annual Research Symposium Abstracts,
Columbus, Ohio, ASNT, 2000, pp. 29-31.
Jones, T.S., "Evaluation of Digital
X-Radiological Imaging Systems for US Air Force Applications," Materials
Evaluation, Vol. 59, 2001, pp. 971-975.
Plantes, Ziedes des, "Eine Neu Method
zur Differenzierung in der Roentgenographie," Acta Radiologica,
Vol. 13, 1932, pp. 182-192.
Polansky, D., T. Jones, R. Placious,
H. Berger and J. Reed, "Real-Time Stereo X-Ray Imaging," 1990 ASNT
Spring Conference - NDE: the Next Decade and Beyond, Columbus,
Ohio, ASNT, 1990, pp. 193-195.
Schulte, R.L., T.S. Jones and H. Berger,
"A Digital X-Ray Inspection System for Full Volumetric Imaging,"
Digital Imaging IV, Columbus, Ohio, ASNT, 2001.
Schulte, R.L., "Full Volumetric Imaging
Using a Digital Flat Panel," ASNT Fall Conference, Columbus, OH, October
2001.
Schulte, R.L., "Full Volumetric Digital
Imaging of Welds," American Welding Society, Nondestructive Testing
of Welds Conference, Houston, Texas, American Welding Society,
May 2002, pp. 195-208.
* Industrial
Quality, Inc., 640 E. Diamond Ave., Suite C, Gaithersburg, MD 20877;
(301) 948-2460; fax (301) 948-9037; e-mail <hberger@indqual.com>.
Copyright © 2002
by the American Society for Nondestructive Testing, Inc. All rights
reserved.
Copyright © 2012 by the American Society for Nondestructive Testing, Inc. ASNT is not responsible for the authenticity or accuracy of information herein. Published opinions and statements do not necessarily reflect the opinion of ASNT. Products or services that are advertised or mentioned do not carry the endorsement or recommendation of ASNT.
IRRSP, NDT Handbook, The NDT Technician and www.asnt.org are trademarks of the American Society for Nondestructive Testing, Inc. ACCP, ASNT, Level III Study Guide, Materials Evaluation, Nondestructive Testing Handbook, Research in Nondestructive Evaluation and RNDE are registered trademarks of the American Society for Nondestructive Testing, Inc. ASNT exists to create a safer world by promoting the profession and technologies of nondestructive testing.
|