
| Volume 1, Number 2 |
|
April 2002 |
TNT
Tips:
Penetrant Dye Removal
After penetrant dwell time comes the job of removal Ñ not a bad job
on smooth surfaces, but tough on rough or irregular surfaces. The old
lint free rag just doesn't get it.
When you encounter the problem areas often found
on as-welded surfaces, machined parts with sharp inside corners, or
parts with depressions or pits, try this. Clean the part using the
normal method and then finish the problem areas with a commercially
available cotton swab or with a cotton swab on a toothpick. If you run
into an inspector or customer who finds this method unacceptable, place
the lint free rag on the part and use the swab to push it into the
problem area.
This method also helps in precleaning and removing
water following water washable or post emulsification operations. Lint
free paper towels can be pushed into tight spots better than thicker
items.
George R. Henke
Napa, California
Cotton Swab and Nonaqueous
Developer
In recent years, many companies have replaced solvents such as
acetone, trichloroethane, and carbon tetrachloride with alcohol for
various reasons. While alcohol is less flammable, does not present as
severe a hazardous waste disposal problem, and doesn't have the toxicity
associated with more volatile solvents, neither does it evaporate as
quickly. This can be annoying when performing penetrant inspections.
Standard practice when confirming indications
detected with color contrast penetrant systems is to remove a suspect
indication with a solvent moistened wipe, allow the solvent to
evaporate, and reapply developer to the area. A discontinuity indication
will generally reappear as the developer dries, confirming the
indication. If a low volatility solvent such as alcohol is used,
evaporation time is significantly increased. I find that spraying
nonaqueous developer onto a cotton swab and wiping the indication saves
time. It removes the indication, cleans the surface, and reapplies
developer in one step.
Carrier and Particulate Pooling
Many times when testing splines of shafts or grooves on a gear, the
accumulation or pooling of magnetic particles and carrier make the
interpretation more difficult.
I find that by using an air nozzle with about 5 lb
(2.3 kg) of air pressure, the carrier can be removed while the particles
stay intact on the indication. The indication jumps out, making it much
easier to interpret.
John Morris
Houston, Texas
[ The NDT Technician ]
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Nondestructive Testing, Inc. ASNT is not responsible for the authenticity or accuracy of information herein. Published opinions and statements do not necessarily reflect the opinion of ASNT. Products or services that are advertised or mentioned do not carry the endorsement or recommendation of ASNT.
IRRSP, NDT Handbook, The NDT Technician and www.asnt.org are trademarks of the American Society for Nondestructive Testing, Inc. ACCP, ASNT, Level III Study Guide, Materials Evaluation, Nondestructive Testing Handbook, Research in Nondestructive Evaluation and RNDE are registered trademarks of the American Society for Nondestructive Testing, Inc.
ASNT exists to create a safer world by promoting the profession and technologies
of nondestructive testing.