 |
| Volume 5, Number 3 |
|
July 2006 |
Unique applications originating from the Columbia
space shuttle catastrophe required the development and implementation
of new radiographic technology. A very large CMOS digital system incorporating
the parallax method was developed to view the reinforced carbon carbon
panels that shield the space shuttle.
New Technology Needed
On January 16th, 2003, the space shuttle Columbia took
off into the Florida sky on what would be its last flight. One and a
half minutes into the launch, insulating foam disengaged from the central
booster tank and fell — impacting the leading edge of the left
shuttle wing and damaging the reinforced carbon-carbon (RCC)
composite panels that protected the shuttle from the heat generated
by atmospheric friction. During re-entry, the unprotected surface allowed
heat to penetrate into the wing structure causing the structural members
of the wing to fail, and the shuttle to disintegrate at supersonic speed.
In addition to determining the cause of the crash, the
investigation conducted by the Columbia Accident Investigation Board
(CAIB) concluded that more inspections were needed for the shuttle program
and that new technology was needed to assay the integrity of the RCC
panels. Each wing of the shuttle has twenty-two U-shaped RCC panels;
one side of the U is flat, the other composed of a continuously variable
curve. New technology utilizing the parallax method and incorporating
a complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) three-dimensional
digital imager was developed specifically for the inspection task.
Computer-Generated Tomography
Before discussing the advanced imaging technology of the
parallax method, it is helpful to have a basic understanding of the
computer-generated tomography it is similar to. The word tomography
is derived from the Greek word tomos meaning a piece cut off
or a cross-sectional view. Tomography therefore is a technique in which
a single selected plane or slice can be imaged. Through the use of software,
the outlines of structures in all other planes can be eliminated. Alternatively,
many sections can be viewed simultaneously from a single perspective
to show the volume of a particular area or the entire structure of the
item being imaged.
Tomography has been around the industrial and medical
fields for approximately thirty years. Most of us are probably more
familiar with medical tomography applications in which the patient is
positioned on a flat table that is indexed horizontally through a ring-housing
containing an imager and an X-ray device. The radiographic source and
the imaging panel are situated directly opposite each other within the
ring-housing and are rotated around the patient. This rotation, in conjunction
with the indexing of the table captures a series of cross-sectional
planar images that are helical in structure.
Industrial tomography varies from medical tomography in
that the X-ray device and the imaging panel are securely mounted and
are stationary during the test. The component to be imaged is placed
on a turntable that is situated in-line between the source and the imager.
The turntable is rotated (indexed) completely around, stopping at designated
increments to capture a predetermined number of images.
The obvious advantage of tomography over film radiography
is that the component can be viewed three-dimensionally rather than
as a flat two-dimensional image. This allows the determination of depth
and thereby the accurate location of objects or discontinuities within
the component. In addition, the ability to isolate individual layers
of an object allows the observer to look at areas of interest without
the superimposed images of the rest of the component.
The disadvantage of industrial tomography is that the
helical data acquisition technique creates massive data files that typically
take many hours or even days to process, depending on the sensitivity
required. The required sensitivity determines the number of images the
system must acquire. The diameter of the smallest discontinuity to be
detected is the minimum rotational increment. The following formula
may be used to determine the minimum number of images required to detect
a discontinuity of a specified size:
C ÷ Dmin = X
Where:
C = circumference of imaged object
Dmin = minimum defect size
X = number of images required
Using this formula, if one wanted to detect a 0.05 in.
(1.27 mm) discontinuity in an object that was 30 in. (76.2 cm) in diameter,
600 planar images would have to be acquired. For further discussion
of computed tomography, the reader is referred to additional documentation.1-3
Parallax Method
What does parallax mean? Parallax is the apparent change
in the position of an object resulting from the change in the direction
or position from which it is viewed. The significant advantage of the
parallax method is that by employing basic geometry, it can greatly
reduce the number of images required to render a component, thereby
increasing the number of specimens that can be processed in an equivalent
amount of time. Typically, a digital system using the parallax method
will only require the acquisition of 4, 8, 16, or 32 images. It is how
the images are taken and processed that distinguishes the parallax method
from ordinary tomography.
The parallax system images the component at an angle.
The angular cross-section represents the component from top to bottom
and includes aspects of the component’s width in the image. Picture
the first image as a diagonal cross-section of the component. Using
correlating data from another diagonal cross section, dimensions and
densities are projected vertically and horizontally. By correlating
the different perspectives together, the computer generates the different
vertical and horizontal planes. One plane may image the front of an
object accurately while another images the side. When this data is correlated
with a top or bottom view, we gain a three-dimensional image. This technique
greatly reduces the affects of geometric unsharpness. Additional
information regarding the topics of parallax and stereo radiography
can be found in other resources.4
The parallax system developed to inspect the RCC panels
for the space shuttle program is permanently installed in a vault that
is 15 ft. X 15 ft. X 20 ft. (4.6 m X 4.6 m X 6 m). The wall behind the
linear array is lined with 1.75 in. (4.4 cm) of lead shielding to protect
personnel. Wall-mounted emergency shut-off switches and a safety interlock
on the entrance door are additional safety requirements. A 450 kilovolt
(kV), horizontally mounted, X-ray device is utilized (Fig. 1a). The
linear CMOS array is mounted horizontally between two uprights masts
(Fig. 1b). The array may be moved to any elevation on the masts.
Also mounted on two vertical masts in the center of the
system is a mechanized turntable. The six-foot diameter round table
has motion control in two axes. The imager and X-ray tube remain stationary
and the component is rotated. The component does not rotate during data
acquisition. Through the use of gear reduction motors, the table is
tilted to 45 degrees before processing begins and is held at that angle
for the duration of the inspection by two locking rotors. High strength
aramid fiber straps secure the test component to the turntable. The
restraining straps are relatively transparent during imaging and will
not adversely affect the procedure.
Image quality indicators (IQIs) can be used during
the course of the inspection. Traditional penetrameters or wire-type
penetrameters can also be incorporated around the component to ensure
sensitivity. However, for accurate linear measurements of a component,
the most important indicators are round metal discs of known diameters.
These serve as points of reference when the images are correlated and
provide a known dimension within the completed images as well. Step
wedges may also be placed within the viewing area for the same purpose.

With the proper X-ray procedure for
imaging the material of interest established, the parallax system is
now ready to begin data acquisition. The required voltage (V) and amperage
(A) are programmed into the X-ray machine and the tube is turned on.
The linear array takes a snapshot of the photon energy penetrating through
the component. When the image is complete, the X-ray tube is turned
off. For most materials, the image is acquired in less than one second.
A computer communicates with a motion control system that drives the
rotation of the table and the table is indexed the predetermined number
of degrees with feedback from encoders. When in position for the next
perspective, the X-ray tube is reactivated, and another image is captured.
This process will repeat itself until the required numbers of images
have been completed.
The individual images are then processed by the computer
to form a three-dimensional representation of the component. This aspect
of parallax imaging process is the most time consuming part, taking
approximately an hour.
The round metal disks that were placed around the component
are now used to calibrate an accurate virtual caliper. Precise measurements
can be made by clicking a mouse where the measurement is to start and
dragging the cursor to the point where the measurement is to end. Discontinuities
can be sized and evaluated by precise measurements in all three major
axes. The three-dimensional representation is scalable and can be viewed
in any plane with sharp, distinct edges.
Detecting Panel Discontinuities
The procedure to detect discontinuities on the RCC panels
requires the X-ray radiation to penetrate the material at a line tangent
to the discontinuity. One of the primary areas of interest in each of
the forty-four shuttle panels is the point at which the leading edge
blends into the straight section of the panel. Using a tomographic system,
it would be necessary to image through approximately 24 in. (61 cm)
of material. This is because the panel sits flat on the turntable as
the horizontal images are acquired. At certain points, some areas of
interest cannot be viewed because the material is too thick to be imaged.
Alternatively, the parallax method tilts the panel 45 degrees for imaging
and all of the images are acquired while in this plane. This means that
if an area is too thick to view in one plane, there are at least two
other image planes that bisect the area of interest at different angles.
The data from those two planes can be projected to reconstruct the area
of interest. Thus, the parallax method increases the effective volume
that can be imaged when compared to tomography.
Conclusion
Similar to computed tomography in that it also allows
for the construction of a three-dimensional representation of the component
being examined, parallax imaging has the significant advantage of requiring
far fewer images to do so. This results in a proportional increase in
the number of components that can be processed in an equivalent amount
of time. In addition to the ability to render scalable images with distinct
delineation, parallax imaging also allows accurate depth (location)
and linear measurements and can image unique part geometry not possible
with traditional tomography.
TNT
References